DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS & BURDEN OF PROOF IN EMPLOYMENT | LABOUR LAW

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS & BURDEN OF PROOF IN EMPLOYMENT | LABOUR LAW

DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS & BURDEN OF PROOF IN EMPLOYMENT | LABOUR LAW


DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

BY

SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN

(2026 SCMR 105)

Saeed Ahmed v. Nestlé Pakistan Limited

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan Bench: Muhammad Ali Mazhar, J., Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, J. & Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi, J. Date of Decision: 23 July 2025 Citation: 2026 SCMR 105 Case No.: C.P.L.A. No. 1285-K of 2022 Appeal From: Judgment dated 11.10.2022 passed by the High Court of Sindh, Karachi in C.P. No. D-4469 of 2019

Central Legal Issue

Whether dismissal from service can be sustained when misconduct is not proved through credible evidence in a domestic inquiry?

Factual Background

  • The petitioner was a permanent workman under the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 and Industrial Relations Act, 2012.
  • In September 2015, he underwent a dental procedure and submitted a medical reimbursement bill of Rs. 10,000 under the employer’s approved policy.
  • On 01.12.2015, he was issued a show-cause notice alleging that the bill was bogus/fake.
  • A domestic inquiry was conducted, culminating in dismissal from service.
  • The petitioner filed a grievance before NIRC:
    • Single Bench: Upheld dismissal
    • Full Bench: Set aside dismissal and ordered reinstatement
  • The employer challenged the Full Bench order before the Sindh High Court, which restored the dismissal.
  • The employee approached the Supreme Court.

Statutory Framework Involved

Relevant Laws

  • Industrial & Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968
    • Standing Orders 1(b) & 12
  • Industrial Relations Act, 2012
  • Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199

Burden of Proof in Disciplinary Proceedings

Employer Must Prove Misconduct

The Supreme Court reaffirmed that:
  • In disciplinary proceedings, the primary burden of proof squarely lies on the employer.
  • Misconduct must be proved on preponderance of evidence, which must be:
    • Clear
    • Credible
    • Logically probative
📌 Key Holding: No presumption of guilt can be drawn against an employee in the absence of reliable and corroborated evidence.

Failure to Produce the Star / Key Witness

Fatal Defect in the Inquiry

  • Multiple dental receipts were available on record showing conflicting amounts (Rs. 7,000 vs Rs. 10,000).
  • The doctor or dental clinic representative was the most material witness to verify:
    • Which receipt was genuine
    • Whether the bill was forged or inflated

Inquiry Officer’s Lapse

The Court held that:
  • The inquiry officer failed in his duty by not summoning:
    • The doctor, or
    • A representative of the dental clinic
  • Without such evidence, truth could not be unearthed.
  • The burden could not be shifted to the employee to call management witnesses.
📌 Finding: The omission to examine the star witness destroyed the evidentiary value of the inquiry.

Domestic Inquiry: Purpose & Minimum Standards

Inquiry Is Not an Empty Formality

The Court emphasized that:
  • A domestic inquiry is not a ritual or rubber-stamp exercise.
  • Even though an inquiry officer is not a judicial officer:
    • Natural justice
    • Fair hearing
    • Reasoned decision-making are minimum non-negotiable requirements.
📌 Observation: A casual or perfunctory inquiry destroys the substratum of disciplinary proceedings.

Quantum of Punishment & Employer’s Prerogative

Punishment Presupposes Proof of Misconduct

The Court clarified that:
  • Determination of punishment is indeed the employer’s prerogative, but only after misconduct is established.
  • Courts may interfere with punishment where:
    • Misconduct is not proved, or
    • The penalty is shockingly disproportionate, or
    • Due process is violated
📌 Principle: Proportionality analysis arises only after guilt is lawfully established.

Role of Constitutional Jurisdiction (Article 199)

Limits of Writ Jurisdiction

The Supreme Court reiterated that:
  • Writ of certiorari may be issued where:
    • Authority acts without or in excess of jurisdiction
    • Natural justice is violated
    • There is an error apparent on the face of record
    • The decision is tainted by mala fides, bias, or illegality
📌 Finding: The High Court exceeded its constitutional jurisdiction by interfering with a well-reasoned Full Bench decision of NIRC.

Supreme Court’s Final Determination

Restoration of NIRC Full Bench Judgment

The Court held that:
  • The Full Bench of NIRC passed a rational, judicious, and lawful judgment.
  • The Sindh High Court’s judgment was unsustainable in law.

FINAL ORDER

  • Petition converted into appeal
  • Appeal allowed
  • Judgment of the High Court of Sindh set aside
  • Judgment of the Full Bench of NIRC restored
  • Dismissal declared unlawful

Ratio Decidendi (Key Legal Principle)

In disciplinary proceedings, misconduct must be affirmatively proved by the employer through credible evidence. Failure to examine the most material witness is fatal to the inquiry, and dismissal based on such defective proceedings is unlawful.

Why This Judgment Is Important

  • Strengthens employee protection in disciplinary matters
  • Reinforces burden of proof on employer
  • Curtails arbitrary dismissals
  • Clarifies limits of High Court’s writ jurisdiction
  • Elevates standards of fair domestic inquiries
 

CONTACT BEST LABOUR LAWYERS IN ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN

For expert advice on Labour Laws, Employment Disputes, Industrial Relations & HR Compliance, contact Osmani Legal Firms, the Best Industrial Relations & Labour Laws Lawyers in Islamabad, Pakistan.

📞 Schedule a consultation today for strategic, compliant, and result-driven legal solutions.

Get Expert Legal Help Today

Your case is handled directly by a senior lawyer with full confidentiality and professionalism. Contact Information Phone / WhatsApp: +92  336-5796999 Email: info@osmanilegal.com Office: Islamabad, Pakistan Book an Appointment | WhatsApp Us Now

BEST LAWYERS | TOP LAW FIRMS IN ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN


Read More

Our Family Lawyers handle Divorce, Khula, Child Custody, Guardianship, Maintenance, and Family Settlement matters with discretion and client-focused Legal representation.

BANKING | FINANCE LAWYERS | LAW FIRMS ISLAMABAD PAKISTAN

Osmani Law represents banks and Private Companies and Clients in banking litigation, finance transactions, loan recovery, default proceedings, and regulatory matters before Banking Courts and Appellate forums. Osmani Law provides expert Shipping, Admiralty and Maritime law services in Karachi, Quetta, and across Pakistan, including ship arrest, cargo claims, marine insurance, charter party disputes, and maritime litigation.

INHERITANCE – DISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTY LAWYERS ISLAMABAD PAKISTAN

Our inheritance lawyers assist with Succession, Letters of Administration, Property Distribution under Islamic and Civil Law, and Inheritance Disputes in Karachi, Islamabad and across Pakistan. Our Rent and Possession Lawyers represent Landlords and Tenants in Eviction Proceedings, Tenancy Disputes, Rent Fixation, and Possession matters before Rent Controllers, Appellate Courts, High Courts & Supreme Court of Pakistan. Our civil lawyers in Karachi & Islamabad handle property disputes, Recovery Suits, Injunctions, Declaratory matters, and all forms of Civil litigation with strategic advocacy before trial Courts, High Courts and Supreme Court of Pakistan. We handle Property transactions, Title verification, Transfer disputes, Land Litigation, Real Estate Development matters, and Property documentation across Pakistan.

CUSTOMS LAWYERS | TOP LAW FIRMS ISLAMABAD PAKISTAN

We advise importers, exporters, and businesses on customs law matters, including valuation disputes, confiscation proceedings, appeals, and representation before Customs Authorities and Tribunals.

ENVIRONMENT LAWYERS | TOP LAW FIRMS ISLAMABAD PAKISTAN

Osmani Law advises on Environmental Compliance, Regulatory Approvals, Environmental Litigation, and sustainability matters under Pakistan’s and Provincial Environmental Protection Laws.

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS | LABOUR LAWYERS ISLAMABAD PAKISTAN

We represent Employers and Employees in Labour  and Industrial Relations disputes, Employment Contracts, Termination cases, and proceedings before Labour Courts, Tribunals, High Court and Supreme Court of Pakistan.

ARBITRATION | MEDIATION LAWYERS | LAW FIRMS ISLAMABAD PAKISTAN

e advise Airlines, Aviation Companies, and regulators on Aviation Law matters, including Aircraft Leasing, Regulatory Compliance, Aviation disputes, and liability claims, delivering trusted legal solutions across Pakistan.

We provide comprehensive Company Law services, including Incorporation, Corporate Governance, Compliance, Shareholding disputes, and representation before SECP and Tribunals.

CRIMINAL LAWYERS | LAW FIRMS ISLAMABAD PAKISTAN

Our Criminal Defense Lawyers represent clients in White-Collar Crimes, FIRs, Bail matters, Trials, Appeals, and Criminal proceedings at all levels of Courts across Pakistan.

We assist businesses with Corporate Structuring, Mergers, Acquisitions, Regulatory Compliance, Commercial Litigation, and Strategic Legal Advisory for Local and International Enterprises.

TRADE MARKS | COPYRIGHTS & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWYERS LAW FIRMS KARACHI- ISLAMABAD PAKISTAN

LABOUR & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS LAW IN PAKISTAN – AN EXCLUSIVE LEGAL GUIDE – OSMANI LAW ASSOCIATES

Post Your Comment

The Osmani Legal Firms, your premier legal firm based in Islamabad, Pakistan, founded by Ahmed Nawaz, Advocate. We provide legal services with the blend of Pakistani expertise and the highest international standards, with an approach of innovation and modernization for our valued clients.
Office Hours
Monday – Saturday

12.00 – 14.45

Sunday – Thursday

17.30 – 00.

Friday – Saturday

17.30 – 00.00

CONTACT US